Is Bluetooth Or Wifi Direct Faster

Shares 77 Article Technical Rating: 8 out of 10 There are numerous wireless standards at your disposal when creating a new product. Each choice has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. It really depends on your goal.

In this article we’re going to look at the three most popular short-range wireless standards including: Bluetooth Classic, Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE), and WiFi Direct. NOTE: If you're serious about developing a new electronic hardware product then download our free cheat sheets - and. The Need for Speed If high speed data transmission is the most critical requirement for your product then most likely WiFi Direct will be the best choice.

Everyone has heard of WiFi, but few know of WiFi Direct. Although that is changing. Standard WiFi requires an access point. So if you want to transfer data from one device to another it must pass through the access point. WiFi Direct has the speed advantages of WiFi without the need for an access point. Data can be transmitted directly from one device to another just like with Bluetooth.

Table 1 – Speed Comparison Wireless Standard Speed Bluetooth Low-Energy 1 Mbps Bluetooth Classic 2-3 Mbps WiFi Direct 100-250Mbps WiFi Direct has a maximum data transfer speed about 10x the speed obtainable with Bluetooth Classic. So, for example, if your product needs to stream video, especially high-definition video, you’ll need the fastest wireless connection possible. Uc Browser 2.0 Version Download more. There is no way Bluetooth will be fast enough, so you’ll almost surely need to offer WiFi Direct connectivity. At the other end of the speed spectrum is Bluetooth Low-Energy (also called Bluetooth Smart) which is about 2-3x slower than Bluetooth Classic, or 20-30x slower than WiFi Direct.

It is typically used for transmitting small amounts of intermittent data, such as sensor readings (temperature, acceleration, etc.) or perhaps GPS coordinates. When you need to constantly transmit data, such as when streaming audio, you’ll usually need to use Bluetooth Classic. Bluetooth Classic is optimized for streaming applications, versus BLE which is optimized for short, infrequent bursts of data. However, it is possible to use BLE for streaming audio, but not at the same quality as with Bluetooth Classic. For example, Bluetooth stack provider, can provide you with a custom Bluetooth LE stack that allows audio streaming.

Oct 25, 2010 The fight is on for wireless device-to-device networking supremacy between a refreshed incumbent, Bluetooth 4.0, and a newcomer, Wi-Fi Direct. More Is Bluetooth Or Wifi Direct Faster videos.

Transmission Range WiFi Direct has a maximum range of about 200 feet, compared to only about 50 feet typically for Bluetooth (Classic and Low-Energy). The increased range of WiFi Direct is possible because of the higher transmission power used by WiFi Direct. The trade off is battery life and this increased transmission power will drain a small battery much faster than either Bluetooth standard. Table 2 – Range Comparison Wireless Standard Speed Bluetooth Low-Energy 50 ft typically, but up 1,500 ft with range extender Bluetooth Classic 50 ft typically, but up to 3,000 ft with range extender WiFi Direct 200 ft But wait a minutethings aren’t always so simple. There are some exceptions. First of all, there are actually different classes of Bluetooth transmitters.